In general all the mini-revolutions Virtual Internet, which is the Sierra Morena of communism recycling and games, I look ridiculous, full of sound and fury, but lacking brain. Wikipedia is another example.
The Wikipedia unmentionable part of premises, as that knowledge is held by a minority which makes use of manipulative political ends. The solution to this alleged defect happens, they say, to extend the power handling to most to be autoneutralice. Far from achieving, making their articles op-eds in near misses mutilated, inaccessible trenches, crude propaganda or reckless plagiarism (typical case of the English language version), and their heroes of Soviet stamp entitled to decoration of hands-on "vandals hunters."
Dream anarchy produces monsters "is being shown, is contrary to science. A contest of wills for knowledge, condensed but inarticulate, flattened or final state can only tend to chaos. There is no correct those flaws without compromising with the complete subversion of the essence of the project and, finally, access to par with the incumbent. Change everything so that nothing changes. Encyclopedia more with the new issue offered to satisfy the ego of the readers by giving them an illusion of participation fee.
Wikipedia may work through the multitude of brilliant individuals that comprise it, as the influx of employees is massive, and you know you can also preserve their best contributions to a fair selection. However, all this is thanks to the Internet, common sense and very providential though Wikipedia itself, which inevitably weakened by its exacerbation naive.
sometimes loses the thread in one article because it has been modified by hundreds of zanganillos dissenting. It's like if you put ten people working in an orchard of five square meters, is annoying and it will end up worse than they were two or one.
the end you spend more effort in fight to avoid being deleted or dilute it somewhat (fight that involves a tacit horse trading criteria, claudication purely political) to write this thing.
And what is worse, the proposed merger of knowledge, with countless innovative mechanisms in your hand, the transfer has failed interdisciplinary maintaining traditional patterns and curriculum divisions. Eat too bourgeois. In view of the results, made eligible for "the people", I recommend less pretentious alternative input.
0 comments:
Post a Comment