I agree to award the prize to a macho stories from a publication "progressive" double standard demonstrates nauseating. There is much truth in the mental reservations tartufescas you mention when referring to the jury. But the failure to attribute some stupidity hermeneutics that wanted to see in a schizophrenic text basically a big "complaint" background ("to" consumerism "as his character is a compulsive consumer of sex?). In short, the worst of Rafael, which also has its "inputs", while unoriginal, is very poorly handled irony and no one knows if their alleged self-esteem crisis repent in earnest, in jest, metaphorically or three things at once.
My personal opinion is that the clan School wanted us to know that is not afraid of anything and despise all sexual conventions, although it is narrated in the "Daily" is quite conventional. The award is an ode to pornography and the reality show, in addition to implicit harassment "Puritans." They do not realize that they are themselves the harassed. These opportunists who never have taken seriously what they say, have a deserved complex prude. Which does not mean that they are geniuses of 'marketing' .
But the funny thing is that Rafael, the ezcritor be honored, no doctrinal tenets Share Enracio Escodans . Under the rhetoric of "publish without mediators" who wields Rafa, his policy of getting private donations in stark contrast with the approach of "invisible hand" culturalibristas' own. Here is more invisible than ever: not even have it in mind. To be financed directly by fans outside the scope copyleft of the salaries "alternative" and cover their magical culture for all. It is pure and simple old-fashioned patronage. And Nacho also supports it, not tell.
0 comments:
Post a Comment