I do not defend the SGAE point by point, I am not Christ, I have to bear the sins of the copyright. But I do not think that piracy is a consequence of corporate evil, "a symptom", as its apologists. For nothing. It is a mere application of liberal principles: maximum power consumption, low cost.
From vilified SGAE has not been questioned both the use of individual access to culture, including making public provision (total and no added value) of copyrighted material. At one time who were getting a work he did unlawfully for profit, as the waste that implied, while today it is not true in all cases.
This is the loophole that has created the Internet: Before the network was not possible to hack without serious costs to the scale at which today is pirated. I say "hack" because, even if done without a clearly stated profit (not generate revenue, but savings), the quantitative change in the reproductive capacity and data transmission has made the term in its reprehensible sort , to apply "mutatis mutandis" to the Internet.
complained about an unfair charge, but should know that an injustice leads to another. The State must provide remedies for all damages that people are not forced to suffer for its own negligence or malice, either through private law (tort law or insurance) and public law (pensions, royalties). And we agree that the loss on the authors is determinable injury.
Add to this that is the norm, according to market rules, the cost increase will be reflected in the price that consumers end up paying. Finally, it is logical that the right of private copying has been restricted to the family, because now, thanks to P2P networks, one can have too many friends. " Where is
rare, then? Falls within the normal range, and every beast in the jungle as you can survive.
addition, musical and cultural trash begets not nor Jewish banking SGAE, but consumers. The same people who have moved into pirates when they had the chance. Those who now cry and ask for a better world.
The nature of the culture depends more on the talent of the artist and the public availability of the same (small or large) that the economic and legal system. It is a sobering paradox: the more brutalized are the mass culture is more elitist, but the more educated are those, it becomes more brutal.
0 comments:
Post a Comment